Position paper
To cope with the US funding adjustments, OCHA-coordinated responses have been forced to make difficult choices about how to reprioritise activities within Humanitarian Response Plans (HRPs). This effort aimed to adjust responses to focus on 1) geographic areas with the highest severity of needs and 2) life-saving activities (including protection) – typically Strategic Objectives 1 and 2 in HRPs.
Without aligning short-term funding allocations to this reprioritisation effort, the significant shortage of funding within the system would mean that some people with the highest severity of needs would not receive assistance.